Herrstedt, J., Roila, F., & ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2009). Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical recommendations for prophylaxis. Annals of Oncology, 20(Suppl. 4), 156–158.
To provide guidance to clinicians for the prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy of varying emetogenic potential
The evidence-based process was not fully described. Specific research was not stated. Literature cited were the antiemetic resource center at www.mascc.org and the Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2004 consensus conference, cited in Annals of Oncology 2006, 17, 20–28.
Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation as used by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) were applied to specific recommendations and considered by the authors and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) faculty. This was approved by the ESMO guidelines working group.
This reference provides definitions of nausea and vomiting; relative emetogenic potential of oral and IV drugs; recommended drugs, dosing, and schedules for antiemetic drugs; and recommendations for management of nausea and vomiting based on emetogenic potential.
Specific regimens are outlined below. Stated level (I–V) and grade of evidence assessed are shown in parentheses.
Herrstedt, J., Sigsgaard, T.C., Nielsen, H.A., Handberg, J., Langer, S.W., Ottesen, S. & Dombernowsky, P. (2007). Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the antiemetic effect of tropisetron plys metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo in patients receiving multiple cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15, 417-426.
To compare tropisetron plus metopimazine versus tropisetron plus placebo for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
This study reported on 82 patients with germ cell tumors scheduled to receive four cycles of cisplatin, given as a five-day treatment every three weeks.
This was a randomized, double-blind trial.
Patients used diaries to record the number of vomiting and retching episodes, nausea severity (on a four-point Likert-type scale), and appetite evaluation (on a four-point Likert-type scale).
Satisfaction with antiemetic treatment was collected via a categorical question (satisfied versus not satisfied). Those who were not satisfied with the antiemetic treatment were withdrawn from the study, as they were requesting additional or other treatments.
Tropisetron plus metopimazine was reported to be superior to tropisetron plus placebo in the overall period (days 1-9) in terms of complete protection from vomiting as well as decreased nausea. The treatment arm also was superior over multiple cycles, providing cumulative emetic protection.
This study addressed an appropriate and effective antiemetic prophylaxis for multiple-day chemotherapy regimens (usually cisplatin-based). However, antiemetic control in both treatment arms was poor.
Since this study was conducted, newer agents (i.e., palonosetron and aprepitant) have been proven to have greater efficacy than the treatments used in this study. Furthermore, the treatments described in this study are known to be inferior to treatments that include a corticosteroid. Finally, the rates of protection from CINV associated with the agents studied are not good.
Herrstedt, J., Roila, F., Warr, D., Celio, L., Navari, R., Hesketh, P., . . . Aapro, M.S. (2017). 2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: Prevention of nausea and vomiting following high emetic risk chemotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25, 277–288.
RESOURCE TYPE: Evidence-based guideline
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
One thousand three hundred and thirty articles were initially retrieved, and a final set of 22 were used for the update.
Very few studies examining olanzapine were included. More evidence is available.
This review provides guidelines regarding prophylaxis for acute and delayed CINV for patients receiving HEC or AC-based chemotherapy. Recommendations are consistent with those of other professional groups. This review does not include the consideration of dexamethasone-sparing regimens and does not include the full range of olanzapine-based regimen evidence.
Herrstedt, J., & Roila, F. (2008). Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical recommendations for prophylaxis. Annals of Oncology, 19(Suppl. 2), ii110–ii112.
PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians for the prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
PATIENT POPULATION: Patients receiving cancer chemotherapy of varying emetogenic potential
PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT: The process was not fully described. The references cited were the antiemetic resource center on the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer's (MASCC's) website and the Antiemetic Subcommittee of MASCC's 2004 consensus conference, cited in Annals of Oncology 2006, volume 17, pages 20–28. The levels of evidence and grades of recommendation used by the American Society of Clinical Oncology were applied to specific recommendations and considered by the authors and ESMO faculty.
This reference provides definitions of nausea and vomiting; the relative emetogenic potential of oral and IV drugs; recommendations of drugs, dosing, and schedules for antiemetic drugs; and recommendations for the management of nausea and vomiting based on emetogenic potential.
Herrington, J.D., Jaskiewicz, A.D., & Song, J. (2008). Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study evaluating aprepitant single dose plus palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer, 112, 2080–2087.
To evaluate the efficacy of one-day versus three-day administration of aprepitant in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC)
The study was conducted in a single site.
All patients were in active treatment.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative pilot study.
This study suggested that a single, 125-mg dose of aprepitant provides similar effectiveness compared to the 3-day regimen. The addition of palonosetron and dexamethasone provided protection against emesis in more than 90% of patients during the 5-day study period.
The use of aprepitant has shown to be effective in preventing acute and delayed emesis in patients who are receiving cisplatin- and anthracycline-containing therapies.
Herr, K., Titler, M., Fine, P.G., Sanders, S., Cavanaugh, J.E., Swegle, J., . . . Forcucci, C. (2012). The effect of a translating research into practice (TRIP)-cancer intervention on cancer pain management in older adults in hospice. Pain Medicine, 13, 1004–1017.
To promote the adoption of evidence-based pain practices for older adults with cancer
No significant differences existed between the E and C groups in regards to improvement in the CPPI. A decrease in pain severity was found from baseline to post-intervention in the E group, but this was not statistically significant.
Numerous factors influence a multicomponent intervention. Culture, competing priorities, intervention complexity, and other factors may have a role. Future studies should focus on more specific factors in need of change. Although the patient sample was large, only eight hospices comprised each group for the study.
Translating research into practice is a primary goal of nursing, and pain guideline translation is essential to improving pain outcomes. Translation, however, takes time and may not translate immediately to improved patient outcomes.
Hernandez-Reif, M., Ironson, G., Field, T., Hurley, J., Katz, G., Diego, M., . . . Burman, I. (2004). Breast cancer patients have improved immune and neuroendocrine functions following massage therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 45–52.
Patients were randomized to receive massage therapy or standard treatment. The massage therapy group received 15 massages that were 3–30 minutes long per week by a trained massage therapist for four weeks. The control group received standard medical care alone.
Massage did show some benefit in patient mood scale assessment tools and immune system function. Specifically, reduced anxiety was found on the STAI after the first and last sessions. Reduced depression was found on the POMS depression score after the first and last sessions and from the first to the last day of the study. The SCL-90-R confirmed a reduction in depression from the first to the last day. Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-ranks tests revealed an increase in dopamine and serotonin levels in the massage group; the control group showed a significant increase in norepinephrine. Natural killer cell cytotoxicity did not attain significance.
Hernandez-Reif, M., Ironson, G., Field, T., Hurley, J., Katz, G., Diego, M., . . . Burman, I. (2004). Breast cancer patients have improved immune and neuroendocrine functions following massage therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 45–52.
Immediate effects: Analysis of variance on STAI revealed a significant (p < 0.001) group effect on the first day’s change scores, and subsequent Bonferroni t-tests revealed reduced anxiety scores for the massage and PMR groups when compared to the control group. The longer-term effects (SCL-90R subscale) did not differ significantly among the three groups.
Hernández Muñoz, G., & Pluchino, S. (2003). Cimicifuga racemosa for the treatment of hot flushes in women surviving breast cancer. Maturitas, 44(Suppl. 1), S59–S65.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Cimicifuga racemosa (CR BNO 1055) on hot flashes caused by tamoxifen adjuvant therapy in young premenopausal breast cancer survivors. This treatment presents an off-label use of CR BNO 1055 (also known as black cohosh).
Participants took one tablet twice daily with meals for 60 days. Duration of treatment was five years for tamoxifen, and 12 months for CR BNO 1055. Participants were instructed not to initiate new therapies for hot flashes while participating in the study. Forty-six participants were randomly assigned (1-2) to receive tamoxifen 20 mg per day orally (usual-care group;mean age = 47 years); 90 participants received tamoxifen plus CR BNO 1055 corresponding to 20 mg of herbal drug (intervention group; mean age = 46 years.).
This was a two-arm, randomized and open-label trial. The primary endpoint was to assess the effect of CR BNO 1055 on the frequency and intensity of hot flushes.
Control visits occurred every two months, when the supply of CR BNO 1055 was replaced and clinical assessments made. Hot flashes were considered severe when five or more heat episodes occurred during the day and were accompanied by sweating, sleep disturbances, feeling of irritation, and anxiety. A few episodes of heat with discrete sweating were classified as moderate hot flushes. Participants completed hot flash diaries at baseline, at every control visit, and at the end of the study at 12 months.
The hot flash patterns were significantly different between the two groups using Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.01). Among the 46 study participants included into the usual-care group, 73.9% experienced severe hot flushes and 26.1% moderate symptoms. Among the 90 study participants in the intervention group, at the end of the study, 46.7% were free of hot flashes, and 24.4% reported severe symptoms.
In the intervention group, the administration of CR BNO 1055 in combination with tamoxifen for a 12-month period significantly reduced the vasomotor episodes induced by tamoxifen in breast cancer survivors.
Methodologic problems included an open label trial and unbalanced arms (twice as many participants in the Black Cohosh group as in the usual care group).
Hernandez-Reif, M., Ironson, G., Field, T., Hurley, J., Katz, G., Diego, M., . . . Burman, I. (2004). Breast cancer patients have improved immune and neuroendocrine functions following massage therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 45–52.
The intervention consisted of 30-minute progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) sessions three times per week for five weeks versus massage therapy for five weeks versus a control group. Participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and after the first and last sessions. Longer-term anxiety effect was examined by comparing pre first day and pre last day measures on the STAI and by the Symptom Checklist (SCL)-90R (revised) anxiety subscale administered on the first and last days of intervention. Blood samples were drawn to evaluate immune response for natural killer (NK) cell production, cytotoxicity, and hormone levels.
The study reported on three groups: PMR (n = 20), massage therapy (n = 22), and control (n = 16).
A three-group experimental study design was used.
ANOVA on STAI revealed a significant (p < 0.001) group effect on the first day’s change scores; subsequent Bonferroni t tests revealed reduced anxiety scores for the massage and PMR groups when compared to the control group. The longer-term effects (SCL-90R subscale) did not differ significantly among the three groups. Massage therapy demonstrated an increase in dopamine, serotonin, NK cells, and lymphocytes.
This study supports the use of massage treatment and relaxation therapy to reduce anxiety, pain, and depression in women with breast cancer.