Purpose/Objectives: To develop a descriptive framework of the communication processes used by Latinos with prostate cancer to communicate about their diagnosis.
Research Approach: A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to analyze and build a descriptive framework from semistructured interviews.
Setting: A university-affiliated urban hospital in southern California.
Participants: 30 Latinos treated for prostate cancer, who had at least one first-degree male relative (FDMR), and who lived near the medical center.
Methodologic Approach: Semistructured interviews with bilingual Latinos were conducted in participants' homes in the language they preferred. Individual and collaborative analyses of translated transcripts were guided by constructivist grounded theory.
Findings: Analysis uncovered an overarching process of purposeful interacting. Components of the process included occasionally overlapping spheres of communication, which were connected to purposes and content. Balanced in and influenced by the spheres were cross-cutting processes of respectful silence and selective disclosure.
Conclusions: Men communicated different content about their prostate cancer to people representing different reference groups. Respectful silence and selective disclosure could be viewed as men's enactment of social interaction—using and choosing words based on the symbolic meaning the men perceived would have their intended meaning for the people in each of the spheres.
Interpretation: Culturally sensitive educational interventions should be targeted at Latinos with prostate cancer to understand risk and encourage disclosure to FDMRs.
References
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charon, J. (2007). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (9th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gray, R. E., Fitch, M., Phillips, C., Labrecque, M., & Fergus, K. (2000). To tell or not to tell: Patterns of disclosure among men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 9, 273-282. doi:10.1002/1099-1611(200007/08)9:4<273::AID-PON463>3.0.CO;2-F
Hilton, S., Emslie, C., Hunt, K., Chapple, A., & Ziebland, S. (2009). Disclosing a cancer diagnosis to friends and family: A gendered analysis of young men's and women's experiences. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 744-754. doi:10.1177/1049732309334737
Jackson, T., Davis, K., Haisfield, L., Dawson, D., Lynch, J., Regan, J.,… Taylor, K. (2010). Disclosure of diagnosis and treatment among early stage prostate cancer survivors. Patient Education and Counseling, 79, 239-244. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.004
Maliski, S., Rivera, S., Connor, S., Lopez, G., & Litwin, M. S. (2008). Renegotiating masculine identity after prostate cancer treatment. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1609-1620.
McDowell, M. E., Occhipinti, S., Gardiner, R. A., Baade, P. D., & Steginga, S. K. (2009). A review of prostate-specific antigen screening prevalence and risk perceptions for first-degree relatives of men with prostate cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 18, 545-555. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01046.x
Papadopoulos, I., & Lees, S. (2004). Cancer and communication: Similarities and differences of men with cancer from six different ethnic groups. European Journal of Cancer Care, 13, 154-162. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2004.00448.x
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012). Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62, 10-29. doi:10.3322/caac.20138.
Vega, W., Rodriguez, M., & Gruskin, E. (2009). Health disparities in the Latino population. Epidemiologic Reviews, 31, 99-112. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxp008
